The deal is not public, and an email says act before it is. Under the market abuse rules, that line can be unlawful disclosure of inside information. VerbaPulse flags the non-public deal disclosure in Outlook and Gmail before the message sends.
Inside information is precise, non-public information that would likely move a price if it were known. Under the Market Abuse Regulation in the EU and its UK equivalent, disclosing it outside the normal course of duties, or dealing on it, is market abuse. The leak is often a sentence, not a trade: a colleague sharing a deal that has not been announced, or hinting that someone should act before it is.
The risk concentrates with the people who legitimately know something the market does not, the deal teams, advisers, and relationship managers. They are not trying to break the rules. They are moving a process along, and the helpful line ("between us, this signs Friday") is the disclosure. Surveillance and trade monitoring look for the consequence. The cheaper place to stop it is the sentence.
VerbaPulse reads the draft as it forms and flags the span that discloses non-public information, with a plain reason. Real output from the product:
The same check covers the related patterns:
VerbaPulse does not watch trading, order flow, or your surveillance alerts, and it does not decide what is inside information. Those belong to your market abuse framework. VerbaPulse sits at the one point they do not cover: the outbound message, where a helpful line becomes an unlawful disclosure. It is one control inside email compliance for financial services, and it complements the surveillance and archiving systems you already run.
For the evidence behind this, our language risk benchmark runs real, anonymized cases through the product and reports what it flags.