Install in minutes
The Outlook add-in deploys org-wide through the Microsoft 365 admin center, and the Chrome extension covers Gmail. No new tab, no change to how the team works.
Legal Teams › Admissions Against Interest
"That was our fault, we dropped the ball" feels like the decent thing to write. In a dispute it is a discoverable admission. VerbaPulse flags fault-admitting language before the message sends.
Real output from the product. Phrase-level, in the writer's voice. The point survives, the risky version does not.
Outlook, Gmail and LinkedInWhere your team already writes
Microsoft 365 CertifiedOutlook add-in
Azure, SwedenEU processing on the cloud edition
No content retained by defaultRisk type and action only
When something goes wrong, the instinct is to own it: that was our fault, we were negligent, we clearly messed up. In a relationship that is good manners. In litigation it is an admission against interest, written by the party it hurts, and it is discoverable.
VerbaPulse is not asking anyone to dodge responsibility. It catches the unguarded phrasing so the writer can say what needs saying, and resolve the issue, without handing the other side a quotable admission.
VerbaPulse reads the draft as it forms and flags the span that creates the exposure, with a plain reason.
Install in minutes
The Outlook add-in deploys org-wide through the Microsoft 365 admin center, and the Chrome extension covers Gmail. No new tab, no change to how the team works.
Write as usual
As the draft forms, a risky span is flagged with severity and a plain reason, so the writer sees the exposure in the line they just wrote.
Fix before it sends
Apply the more careful wording, or remove the line, while the message is still a draft. By default, metadata-only events feed an audit trail your team can show.
VerbaPulse does not advise on liability or tell anyone to avoid accountability. It catches the unguarded phrasing in the draft, while the wording can still change, so the message resolves the issue without creating a quote for the other side. It is one control inside email compliance for legal teams, and it complements the systems you already run.
For the evidence behind this, our language risk benchmark runs real, anonymized cases through the product and reports what it flags.
A statement by a party that is unfavorable to its own position, which the other side can use as evidence. In email it looks like "that was our fault" or "we were negligent", written informally and later discoverable. This page describes language risk and is not legal advice.
It flags fault-admitting language as it is written and offers a measured rewrite. For example, "that was our fault" is flagged as a legal fault admission, with rewrites like "we made an error" or "we encountered an issue".
No. It is about not overstating fault in writing before the facts are settled. The writer can still be accountable and resolve the issue; VerbaPulse just catches the absolute, quotable phrasing.
Not by default. Drafts are analyzed in memory and never written to disk, and they are never used to train AI models. By default the audit trail keeps risk events (type, severity, action taken) with no message text and no user identity. An organization can opt in to keeping the flagged phrase, the suggested rewrite and the explanation.