For Compliance Teams

Even a perfect review cannot unsend an email.

You built a careful program: capture, queue, review, remediate. VerbaPulse adds the one control that architecture cannot give you, the moment before send.

The seat you're in

The program is careful. The timing is structural.

Whether your team samples the queue or reads every message in it, one thing is true either way: the email being reviewed has already been delivered. The risky sentence has been sitting in a client's inbox while it waited its turn.

That is not a diligence problem, and it is not your team's failure. It is the sequencing built into the post-send model: the control arrives after the risk. No amount of reviewer headcount changes the order of events.

What changes

From incident reports to non-events

When risky wording is caught in the compose window, the incident never happens. The guarantee becomes a projection before it ships. The confidential figure comes out of the draft. The pressure tactic gets rephrased while it is still nobody's problem.

Your review queues do not disappear, they get quieter. And the conversations your team has with the business change tone: less "here is what went wrong last week", more "here is what no longer goes wrong". Compliance stops being the department of no and becomes the department of before.

What you can show

Evidence that the program works, not just that it exists

Regulators and boards increasingly ask a harder question than "do you have an archive": does your program actually change behavior? VerbaPulse produces that evidence as a byproduct of people simply writing.

Winning the internal conversation

Your stakeholders, answered in advance

Buying a tool that reads drafts touches three desks beyond yours. Here is what each one needs to hear, and what VerbaPulse gives you to say.

DPO & works council
No surveillance by design
Drafts are analyzed in memory and discarded. Nothing is stored, no individual is tracked or scored, and the audit trail is anonymous. The tool helps the writer in the moment; it does not build files on people.
IT
No mail-flow change
An Outlook add-in deployed centrally through the Microsoft 365 admin center and a Chrome extension for Gmail. About five minutes per user, no server integration, nothing in the delivery path.
Finance
A pilot built to be the business case
30 days, up to 10 users, €99 flat, no auto-renewal. The day-25 risk summary is written to be taken into a leadership meeting. Ask about a pilot slot in the demo.
FAQ

Common questions

How is this different from our archiving and surveillance stack?
It is a different layer, not a replacement. Archiving and supervision answer recordkeeping obligations after a message is delivered. VerbaPulse works in the compose window, before send, where the wording can still change. Most teams run both: the archive stays the system of record, VerbaPulse reduces what ends up in its queues.
Can I use it on my own work: investigations, training material, incident reports?
Yes, and this matters more than it sounds. Compliance teams write about violations all day. VerbaPulse distinguishes between committing a risky statement and discussing, quoting, or teaching about one, so your incident report or training email does not trigger a false alarm. Tools without that distinction are unusable for the very people who run them.
What can I see about individuals?
Nothing, by design. The dashboard and audit trail show risk types, severities, trends, and department-level patterns. No message content is stored and no individual is named. That architecture is also your answer to the DPO and the works council.
How do I build the internal business case?
The 30-day Proof of Value Pilot exists for exactly this: up to 10 users, €99 flat, concierge onboarding, and a risk summary on day 25 written to be shown to leadership. It does not auto-renew, and the fee is credited if you convert. Book a demo and ask about a pilot slot.
Will my team actually use it, or click it away?
Adoption lives and dies on false alarms and tone, so that is where the engineering went. Flags explain the risk in plain language, suggestions keep the writer's voice and the message's purpose, and context awareness keeps noise down. The writer experiences help, not censorship.

Bring the control to before send

Book a demo →